firstfrost (
firstfrost) wrote2008-11-06 04:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
short rant
Number 2 in what I keep thinking ought to be a series: Posts that
mjperson ought to have made.
Here's a very short blog post by Steven Levitt.
The punch line is cute. But... he doesn't know how his third-grade daughter is supposed to know what the colors of the rainbow are? SHE'S SUPPOSED TO KNOW BECAUSE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE TEACHING HER THAT!
What are the Great Lakes? I might give him a pass on that not being part of the standard curriculum for your small child. I learned my states, but not my Great Lakes, as a little bitty kid. (
mjperson, as a little bitty kid, did learn them, but he's from New York and I'm from California.). I learned "Thirty days has September" before I can remember, but I think
davehenry told me about knuckle-counting.
But not teaching your kid *colors* is a dereliction of duty. I mean, come *on*. Isn't that like the first thing ever, when you're teaching them words?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Here's a very short blog post by Steven Levitt.
The punch line is cute. But... he doesn't know how his third-grade daughter is supposed to know what the colors of the rainbow are? SHE'S SUPPOSED TO KNOW BECAUSE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE TEACHING HER THAT!
What are the Great Lakes? I might give him a pass on that not being part of the standard curriculum for your small child. I learned my states, but not my Great Lakes, as a little bitty kid. (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
But not teaching your kid *colors* is a dereliction of duty. I mean, come *on*. Isn't that like the first thing ever, when you're teaching them words?
no subject
no subject
I do understand that most parents don't teach their kids much because they don't know much themselves. Likewise, sadly, math teachers in elementary school--half of them are struggling to follow the examples in the book on how to add fractions themselves; they can hardly give their students intuitive explanations in that state.
I do hope somebody responded to that writer with your rant, actually.
no subject
Instead, the pediatrician marked off a missed milestone because he couldn't do "where's mommy's nose?" then suggested that we practice finding parts of our faces in front of a mirror every day at home.
no subject
I am very tempted to quiz Seth, but alas -- he's at ATA.
no subject
no subject
Seth named many colors, including pink and black, and claimed to not know the order of the rainbow. ALthough, he did try to find out by looking for a rainbow in the light refracted by the fish tank.
Eli was able to name the colors in rainbow order, except that he left off blue.
Seth knew what the Great Lakes are, and was able to name two: Erie and Ontario. He asked for a hint -- I said another one begins with "H" -- he guessed "Huperior"? Not sure how to score that :).
None of the kids had a clue on the 30-day months. Dave and I recited the rhyme together, after which Seth insisted vehemently that September has 31 days. Not.
no subject
By 20 months, the language milestone was still throughly missed, but he was a full 4" taller than before; she watched him to see that his motor skills were excellent, had us fill in the autism screening checklist, and then said "well, he's a doer not a talker, don't worry about it" to the language, without asking him to do things.
Now, 23 months, we've started the process of invoking Early Intervention for evaluation of the language (self-referred); our guess is that Denton is just someone who likes to really master skills before he uses them, but asking early intervention to evaluate him doesn't have much downside.
I don't think it was actually so much about teaching the test, as about giving a general impression of "normal".
no subject
My brother was like that. He'd just suddenly use all these words no one knew he knew. My mother took to lying to the pediatrician to make life easier for all.
Also, I think it was fairly late in life (middle school?) before I knew rainbow colors. It just wasn't particularly relevant before that. Then I had the epiphany that they were the primary colors, with the secondary colors between the two primary colors that made them up, and aha! that made sense.
no subject
Colors of the rainbow I certainly didn't know until I learned ROYGBIV in high school.
Which months have 30 days? No idea.
My point is not so much that nobody should be bothered to teach their kids this stuff, but rather, this is all trivia. To me, the question is "what trivia is more interesting". I think I'd probably be much better served knowing, say, the names of the provinces in Canada, or even say half the names of the countries in Africa, than "which months have 30 days".
I also feel like it should be more about the fascination of learning ("this is a prism! shiny, isn't it?" "this is an atlas! This is... oh right, ha ha, this is Canada!") and knowing how to learn. It's interesting that the answer is "ask google" and not "this is the difference between a dictionary, an encyclopedia, and an atlas".
no subject
no subject
I'll also argue that the fascination of learning is grand, if you aren't actually getting at least some facts into your head, you aren't learning all that well, and if your response to questions of facts is usually of the form "I can always just google that" perhaps you don't have a fascination with learning.
no subject
no subject
And seriously, the "colors of the rainbow"? How is it useful to know how people have arbitrarily divided the spectrum of visible light? Actually, it's worse than useless, because it gives the impression that there is some natural phenomenon at work whereby there are seven colors in a rainbow, rather than five or eight or twenty-three. Understanding that it's a full spectrum, and that our partitioning of it is not a reflection of any characteristics of light, would be much more sensible than memorizing ROY G. BIV.
The Great Lakes, though....duh, they live in Chicago, they ought to know that one.
no subject
no subject
I also think it would be more useful to know why there are three primary colors, instead of two or four or six, rather than just knowing their names or what order they're in. For that matter, if you need to know what order they're in, isn't it just as important to know why red is on the outside of the rainbow and purple is on the inside, rather than the other way around?
no subject
no subject
no subject
The difference is that learning the "colors of the rainbow" could be misleading, because it's usually not made clear that the partition is arbitrary (or at least human-centric rather than due to a physical quality of the light). I'm not liable to be misled into false beliefs about Lake Huron by learning its name.
I'm not at all clear what the point is of a test of "general knowledge" in third grade. What do you do with the results?
no subject
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.
The only reason my boys know ROYGBIV is thanks to the Mr. Ray song of the same name. I lost a bet with Sweetie over this, since I thought it was common knowledge afterwhich he proceeded to ask his mother to name them. I figure if MomZ doesn't know it, it taint at all necessary. ;)
Amusing tale from the playground the other day. Bunch of moms standing around, for some unfathonable reason trying to teach their kids the states (we have a big state map on our blacktop.) With my help they were able to get all but one (although I make no claims that I got VT & NH correct. ;) Eventually I had to call the mouse over.... We were missing Wyoming. :)
Clearly I now need to learn this HOMES acronym.