![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Planning, Overplanning, and Underplanning
Apr. 1st, 2008 10:57 pmA couple of runs I've been in recently have run into one of the traditional player schisms, between "keep talking/figuring stuff out" and "time to start the action". The battle cry of the "action now!" people is "A bad plan now is better than no plan later", but often the choice is actually between a bad plan now and a good plan later. Not all attempts to figure something clever out are doomed to failure.
I'm willing to go with a half-assed plan into a combat. A better plan probably won't survive contact with the enemy anyway, and a party in combat often has bonus resources (karma points, one-shot items) that can be thrown in, in the even that things go badly. And, usually, even if the fight turns out not to be winnable, it can be fled from.
But the half-assed "Get 'em!" plan works a lot less well for other plots and conflicts. You can't just charge into a murder mystery and browbeat the first potential suspect to make them confess. Deciding a complicated moral conundrum quickly isn't likely to be satisfactory, and a hit-and-run persuasion will probably not win over the target.
I don't want to bore other players. But it ought to be acceptable to let the thinkers and the action types both have their fun, even if one of the types of fun is slower-moving than the other.
I'm willing to go with a half-assed plan into a combat. A better plan probably won't survive contact with the enemy anyway, and a party in combat often has bonus resources (karma points, one-shot items) that can be thrown in, in the even that things go badly. And, usually, even if the fight turns out not to be winnable, it can be fled from.
But the half-assed "Get 'em!" plan works a lot less well for other plots and conflicts. You can't just charge into a murder mystery and browbeat the first potential suspect to make them confess. Deciding a complicated moral conundrum quickly isn't likely to be satisfactory, and a hit-and-run persuasion will probably not win over the target.
I don't want to bore other players. But it ought to be acceptable to let the thinkers and the action types both have their fun, even if one of the types of fun is slower-moving than the other.