Rising to the Doom
Apr. 18th, 2006 11:47 amSo, due to various people being lame or miscommunicating, and some denial on my part, I ended up getting poked by the producer for Patience yesterday afternoon: the program designer had punted or vanished or fallen in a hole and wasn't answering email, so could I do the program? For Thursday? Of course "for Thursday" really means "for Tuesday" because Copytech wants two days turnaround (unless they're hosed and want three, which could be a problem). So now the program is done and to Copytech, and I've taught myself to use InDesign (which is, I have to kind of admit, a better tool for graphic layout than LaTeX is, much as I love LaTeX). But now "program designer" will haunt me until the end of my days, as my attempt to foist the task off on someone else this time was a catastrophic failure.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-18 07:21 pm (UTC)Next time, if you don't actually want to do it, say No the first time they ask. (And if they really really need you to be a hero at the last minute, they'll probably ask you anyway, but they'll probably be more serrious about solving the problem in some other way first.)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-18 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-18 11:15 pm (UTC)Though you are 1) a superhero with several clones and 2) had the day off, I still think an answer of "I don't think so" would have been a good lesson. In this case, it sounds like you like them and you really *did* have the time and even enjoyed the opportunity, it's just that after being in the workforce for a while, unprofessional scheduling just bugs me.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-19 01:59 am (UTC)I'm not really a Theater Person the way many people I know are. I don't get involved because the Show Must Go On or because it's my Muse or my Hobby, I get involved because people I know ask me to help, and I would rather help the people I like than not. This means it's not hard to convince me to do something, even with poor timing, but it also means I get sad if I feel taken for granted or unappreciated or don't get my pat on the head for doing good.
I have clearly told my anecdote all wrong to get the desired effect, and I must ponder this.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-19 02:29 am (UTC)But I saw you working on it, and interpreted your mood correctly. :-)
Did I mean what you think I meant?
Date: 2006-04-19 07:05 am (UTC)It's just that recently I've seen other people who were convinced to do things that they did not find fun in the slightest which is why I hijacked your entry. :-)
Re: Did I mean what you think I meant?
Date: 2006-04-19 01:29 pm (UTC)(I can usually sort between "stuff I don't want to do" and "stuff I don't mind doing" and "stuff I want to do"; being Productive often pushes things up one class.)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-19 12:12 pm (UTC)But having the group get into the habit relying on some people's ability to make Noble Sacrifices, rather than putting in the work to do the planning and recruiting and monitoring and mentoring that would avoid it, also makes me sad. It's not good for the people who end up doing all the work when they'd rather not, and it's not good for the group's long-term health.
(Also, I was more saying that if you said No firmly up front, you'd be justified in not leaping in to save the day, and if you really didn't want to, you should say so. If you want to, by all means go ahead. :) )