Serieses of books
Jul. 18th, 2006 09:44 am- Infinity Beach (by Jack McDevitt)
- This gets off to a little bit of a slow start - until about page 80 or so, I kept reading a bit and then putting it down and doing something else. But then it picks up, and I stopped being able to put it down until I was done. It's got an interesting long-ago mystery, and spooky bits, and reasonable characterization. Some of the things that the protagonists do, they seem to get away with a little easily, but then, it's a society in which most people are rich introverts, so there's not much crime and thus probably less security. The mystery-following is well done and varied, with lots of document recovery; it thus ends up reading a little bit like a Call of Cthulhu-type mystery but in a science fiction genre. Four and a half stars, and I want to run a game with fancy documents again.
- The Enchanted Forest Chronicles (Dealing with Dragons, Searching for Dragons, Calling on Dragons, Talking to Dragons) by Patricia Wrede
- More children's books in the "revisionist fairy tale" genre (like The Unhandsome Prince, but generally good fun. They're kind of repetitive when all read at once, and do have the children's-book tendency for most of the random NPCs encountered to be helpful, but there's a lot of humor and surprises like a remarkably touching encounter with the dwarf formerly known as Rumplestiltskin. The villains get a little boringly gloaty and foolish, and never seem to remember that the good guys can beat them if they have half a chance. Three and a half twinkly stars for the first book, falling to two and a half by the fourth.
- The Robot trilogy (Caves of Steel, The Naked Sun and Robots of Dawn)
- This is like those music recommendation sites that, after I check a lot of boxes for what I like and don't, proudly tell me that I should like the Beatles. Well, for heaven's sakes, I already know if I like the Beatles or not, it's not like I've totally failed to notice their existence so far. I'm pretty sure nobody needs my advice on whether or not to read Isaac Asimov's second most famous body of work (except maybe
harrock, who is oddly behind on his fiction due to all that non-fiction he reads). I just wanted to read them again, and have my own copies this time.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:08 pm (UTC)Never underestimate your friends' cultural illiteracy. :)
(Of course, I think Asimov is one of those Classic SF Authors I have a hard time reading because his treatment of women rubs me the wrong way--not because the particular authors are particularly bad, so much as they channel their time period really well. I have no idea why this bothers me so much with books written in the 1950s, and not at all with books written in the 1800s. I guess it does bug me in particular with SF books, because they're all about the marvelous advanced future in which women still *obviously* wear lipstick blahblahblah. But I suspect something like, oh, the Hardy Boys would bug me too, :) ))
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:19 pm (UTC)But this is my point. I'm not saying obviously all my friends have read Asimov already, I'm just saying you don't need me to *tell* you, "Hey, there's this author named Isaac Asimov that you've never heard of, he writes about the Three Laws of Robotics and this thing called psychohistory."
Some people don't like the Beatles, and some do. I just think I don't know anyone (except maybe
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 04:52 pm (UTC)I never read any Doc Smith until I was older, but if I had I'd probably be re-reading it now and thinking "wow, I totally don't remember any of this girls can't be Lensmen stuff."
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 08:31 pm (UTC)It was a New York thing.